Before I begin my pretentious repertoire, I need to first introduce an important man. His name is Raul Hilberg. This man was considered–and in some regards still is–the world’s “preeminent scholar of the holocaust.” His 1961 three-volume dissection of the Final Solution, “The Destruction of European Jewry,” is considered the standard of holocaust history.
In 1988, during a PBS taping of a documentary about overcoming rape with tai chi, Hilberg decided to make a fantastic admission about Herr Hitler and the holocaust. The admission, unsurprisingly, was edited out and locked away by PBS.
Luckily for us, the audio was leaked for the first time ever by a Jewish revisionist in 2015. And I have a copy of it.
In order to show this is the genuine audio edited from the documentary, I will present the timeline of where it was sliced out. The documentary can be found here. His speech begins at 53:36. The audio clip linked below (that is uploaded on the official Moonlit History YouTube channel) morphs into where PBS decided to cut.
Now, without further delay, here is Hilberg’s admission:
“In 1976, I went to a small town in Bavaria, Ludwigsburg, which has the headquarters for investigations of so-called National Socialist crimes, an office maintained by the provinces of the Federal Republic of Germany. About thirty prosecutors were housed in that particular building, and I went there to study court records, various affidavits, and other materials.
But one afternoon, they said, “We’re having a party today, would you join us?” Why, yes. They said, “we have one bottle of wine for each person.” (Laughter from audience). And after a while I chanced to talk to the deputy chief of that office, and I said to him this: I’ve been troubled by one question. And I’m afraid that I went into print with something that isn’t entirely accurate. And that is the role of Adolf Hitler himself in the annihilation of the Jewish people in Europe. Now, I know that you are only concerned here with live individuals, and that you do not investigate the dead. But still–what do you think?
“Achh,” he said. “We’ve often fantasized about drawing up an indictment against Adolf Hitler himself. And to put into that indictment the major charge: the Final Solution of the Jewish question in Europe, the physical annihilation of Jewry–and then it dawned upon us: what would we do? We didn’t have the evidence.
…And he laughed.”
Yes, let that soak in for moments few. Inhale. Exhale. What am I to say after presenting this information? What are the possible ramifications of this information? What do you think? What are we supposed to think? We have been force-fed through education and pop-culture that the evidence linking Hitler to the Final Solution is monumental.
Rewind to 1985. Hilberg testified during the infamous Zundel Trial in Canada. He said that there was one, maybe even two, direct orders from Hitler to begin the destruction of European Jewry. Indeed, this man defended under oath the not “entirely accurate” passages of his work. In retrospect, PBS had to edit out this admission, or else a circus in the media would have danced around the fact Hilberg perjured himself.
The 6,000,000 figure is the greatest lingering piece of propaganda in modern history. As clear as day the figure of persecution can be found in countless newspapers before, during, and after the First Great War.
It wasn’t Germany doing the persecuting, keep in mind, it was Russia (a then ally during the First Great War). Here are some examples, courtesy of the Library of Congress:
Naturally you must wonder why we do not train children in school systems about that facet of history. You must wonder why you were entirely oblivious to these facts.
You must wonder why we do not have a national memorial museum in D.C. dedicated to the previous 6,000,000’s that respectively remained stagnant at 6,000,000 for an unusually long amount of time, even though they were apparently being starved and expelled repeatedly, like clockwork.
You must wonder why we don’t see dozens upon dozens of Hollywood movies depicting that facet of forgotten history.
You must further ponder why there are no Orwellian laws restricting the Freedom of Speech when dealing with those pre-WWII persecutions.
Strange, isn’t it?